Monday, December 24, 2012

Boundless Love


“Boundless Love”
Sermon for MCC New Haven
December 23, 2012
Rev. Brian Hutchison, M.Div.


         Who was this woman, Mary, the mother of Jesus? And with so little written about her in the Christian Bible, how have Christians around the world come to know her as the Virgin Mary or Virgin Mother, the Mother of God, and the Queen of Heaven? How have millions of Catholics and others come to pray to her daily? I think we can all agree that within and beyond what Scripture tells us, “There’s something about Mary.”
         From historical records, we know very little about Mary. We know that she was a Jewish peasant girl, probably only around thirteen years old when she finds herself pregnant out of wedlock, which was punishable by stoning. But a man named Joseph promises to marry her, therefore making her his property and responsibility instead of her father’s. Notice how Mary’s parents are nowhere to be found in any of the gospels. Perhaps they had shunned the young Mary so that she would not bring shame on them with a bastard child.
         But Mary knew that she could go to her relative Elizabeth, who was pregnant with John the Baptist. Mary knew that in her trouble, she had to trust those who loved her unconditionally, not those whose love ran dry when it was found out that she had broken the law- and in a very serious way. Even girls who were raped in that time were blamed for the act. We know that blaming the victims is a millennia-old sin. Those of us on the margins know too well what it means to be loved conditionally and to be blamed for misfortunes like hate crimes happening to us.
         Mary went “with haste,” the Scripture says, to Elizabeth’s house. She was deeply afraid for her own wellbeing and for the wellbeing of her unborn child. But Elizabeth showed radical hospitality and took this unmarried pregnant teenager into her home- for three months. And according to Luke, Elizabeth’s unborn child danced in her womb at Mary’s voice. There’s no way we can take this as a historical event, but it is essential to the story, because Elizabeth is convinced that through this shameful circumstance, God is at work.
         Other gospels not found in our Bible add to the story. In one Gospel, Mary’s parents are named: Joachim and Anne. And according to Catholic tradition, Mary was the product of an “Immaculate Conception,” meaning that she was not born with original sin. The story goes that Joachim and Anne were perfect in their obedience to the law and free of personal sin, so Mary was blessed without original sin. This, not the virgin birth of Jesus, is called “The Immaculate Conception” and Mary is sometimes called “The Immaculata.”
         In yet another gospel not found in our Bible, Mary’s midwife checks Mary to make sure that she is a virgin before she gives birth to Jesus. (In other words, she checks for her hymen.) Even in this ancient Christian literature, we are given the graphic details of the human body. Fundamentalists to this day teach that the virgin birth was absolutely essential for God to be incarnate.
         But for progressive and New Thought theologians like myself, none of this really matters. In MCC, we profess in the words of Rev. Dr. Matthew Fox, we are born in “Original Blessing,” not original sin. We profess that from before our birth, God has called us His children, Her beloved. Not a single infant that comes into this world is inherently evil, no matter how much they may make parents unhappy with constant crying and soiling diapers J.
         But to those who wrote our gospels in the first century, virgin birth was a common narrative about important people such as kings and emperors. In Greek and Roman mythology, gods regularly impregnated women. Julius Caesar was said to be a child of a god. So to say that YHWH impregnated a woman was not completely absurd to people in the Greco-Roman world; it was just absurd to the Jews to say it about YHWH.
         Of course the very fact that Mary was the mother of Jesus of Nazareth is enough to make her an important figure in the Christian tradition, but there is something much deeper than that in human history that makes Mary as a divine figure much more meaningful. And that something is not often spoken of, something scandalous, indecent even.
         In essence, the various traditions of Mary or what is called “marianism” are all rooted in indigenous faiths that worshipped goddesses or “the Divine Feminine.” Most Christians are taught growing up that God is masculine. At times, it even seems that “He” is a holy name for God. Yes, YHWH was considered masculine most of the time in the Jewish tradition. And yes, Jesus did call God “Abba,” which is an endearing Aramaic term for Father such as “Papa.” But from the beginning of the Jewish tradition and throughout the Christian tradition, the Divine Feminine has not disappeared.
         Modern archaeologists have found a plethora of goddess statues at the sites of ancient Jewish cities. And in the Christian tradition, as I will go into more detail about, the character and image of Mary become very goddess-like. So regardless of how patriarchal Judaism and Christianity have been, Jews and Christians have still longed for that mothering figure, that feminine energy in their idea of the divine.
         For those of you who grew up Roman Catholic or have spent time among Catholics probably know the most well known Marian prayers. The first is the Hail Mary: “Hail Mary full of grace, the Lord is with thee. Blessed art thou among women and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus. Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death. Amen.” Notice that this prayer is modeled after the scripture that we read from the gospel of Luke today. The first line is exactly what Elizabeth says to Mary. Catholic tradition then named Mary “Mother of God” since Mary birthed Jesus, God in the flesh. And they also hold the belief that the saints are intercessors for the living who pray to them for help. Protestant reformers considered this idolatry and forbid praying to anyone but God. But Catholics and others still pray the Rosary daily, which is based on the Hail Mary prayer.
         The other prayer is called “Hail, Holy Queen”. I will spare you the details of this prayer, but its historical significance is that since the Mesopotamian era (nearly 7,000 BCE, 9,000 years ago), the name “Queen of Heaven” has been used for goddesses.[1] So we can safely say that the veneration of Mary today is primal. In the depth of our psyche, we long for the feminine.
         Today’s Advent theme is “Love.” And this theme fits perfectly with our focus today on Mary. Sure, Mary was probably a very loving mother. But beyond that, for the first 1500 years of Christianity, she was the primary symbol of God’s love. Few people know this, but the Cross did not become the primary symbol of God’s love in the Christian tradition until the Reformation when the printing press allowed printed pornography to sexualize the breast. Before that time, it was the image of the nursing or lactating Mary that Christians looked to in seeking the love of God.[2]
         Mary was called “Maria Lactans” in Latin or “The Wet Nurse of Salvation.” She was often portrayed in art as giving Christians her milk as the expression of God’s love. Saints were even pictured suckling at her breast. Today, we may find this strange. Mothers in our society are encouraged to hide their breast while breastfeeding in public. Since the breast has been so sexualized and since we still hold to the sex-negativity of our Puritan ancestors in faith, the beautiful meaning behind the lactating Mary has been nearly lost.
         The sins of sexism and misogyny have stripped Mary and indeed all women of their sexuality and ownership of their own bodies. The sexual revolution of the 1960s has allowed American women to express their sexuality more openly after the Victorian era of sexual suppression, but it has also opened the way for women to become sexual objects. On the spectrum between denying the body completely and objectifying the body lies a holy Middle Way that we in MCC profess. We see the body and mutual, loving expressions of sexuality as holy. We recognize the functions of the female body as sacred. And last but certainly not least, we reclaim the Divine Feminine, recognizing that the Great Mystery and Ground of Our Being in whose image and likeness we are made includes the essence of Woman.
          Because of the way many of us have been indoctrinated, such assertions may seem like blasphemy. But from our social location as a queer people, these affirmations meet us right where we are, at the core of our lives, in the center of our experience.
         Today, hear the song that Mary sang in the Gospel of Luke as a song for your liberation:
“Our souls magnify the Lord, and our spirits rejoice in God our Savior, for God has looked with favor on us, God’s Rainbow People. Surely, from now on all generations will call us blessed. For El Shadai, the Almighty Breasted One, has done great things for us. God’s mercy is for those who honor God from generation to generation. God has shown strength; God has scattered the bigoted in the hateful thoughts of their hearts. God has brought down the powerful from their seats of power and has lifted up the marginalized. God has filled the hungry with good things, and sent the greedy away empty. God has helped His queer servants, in remembrance of Her mercy, according to the promise God made to our spiritual ancestors and all their descendants forever.”
         Saints, you are descendants in a long line of bold prophets of liberation who have transcended boundaries and embraced a wider vision of the sacred. I know that some of you may always see God as only masculine. I affirm you in your understanding of God. But for those of us who feel that pull of the Holy Spirit within to hold a wider vision of God, we can believe without fear, for in the words of the Gospel of Matthew (23:37), God gathers us as a mother hen gathers her chicks under her wings. Amen.


[1] Stone, Merlin. When God was a Woman, Harvest Press (1976).
[2] Gibson, David. The Washington Post “On Faith” (2012).

No comments:

Post a Comment